Post by troutfarm on Sept 24, 2005 11:35:49 GMT -5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell a friend about BushGreenwatch
Sep 20, 2005 | Back Issues
Critics Say EPA Withholding Information on New Orleans Contamination
Journalists, government watchdogs and a top Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official have criticized EPA's inability to provide adequate data on the location and danger of chemicals leaked into New Orleans communities in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
Last week Hugh Kaufman, a senior EPA policy analyst in the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, said of EPA's water testing efforts, "There is not enough information to draw any conclusions other than EPA has become totally incompetent at water testing, or there is a cover up." [1]
George Sorvalis, outreach associate for OMB Watch, a nonprofit government accountability group, told BushGreenwatch, "EPA does not appear to be testing for chemicals related to the petrochemical and oil industries, including diesel and byproducts of petrochemical refining. These are chemicals you would expect EPA to test for."
"EPA's sampling to date has been spotty and inconsistent," says Darryl Malek-Wiley, a New Orleans-based environmental justice advocate for Sierra Club, who spoke to BushGreenwatch from Baton Rouge. "The amount of sampling that has been done doesn't fully characterize what is happening in New Orleans."
Sorvalis, who has been in close communication with a number of scientists and researchers working in the New Orleans area, said EPA's failure to assess the presence and danger of such chemicals presents a particular concern for rescue workers and others exposed to the contaminated water. "Many chemical byproducts of the petrochemical industry are hazardous to human health and can breach certain types of protective gear," said Sorvalis. "If EPA is not testing for them, how can people make the right choices to protect themselves?"
Not only has EPA failed to distinguish exactly which petrochemical industry byproducts lurk in the floodwaters, said Sorvalis, but the limited amount of information EPA has is poorly organized and difficult to access. "This information should be available by a click of the mouse, but it has taken me, a professional, days to find out the real story."
Sorvalis isn't the only one having trouble getting "the real story" from EPA. Environmental reporters have complained about delayed responses from the agency regarding locations of spills, accidents and fires.
According to a report by the Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ), which cites interviews with numerous environmental reporters, "Journalists are having an increasingly difficult time using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to drag information out of the federal government to shed light on Superfund sites, chemical factories, mining accidents and a host of other topics important to citizens." [2]
Sean Moulton, senior information policy analyst at OMB Watch, says journalists' complaints and his organization's difficulty obtaining certain information are two parts of a common problem brewing within EPA: "A culture of restricting access."
Sorvalis ties the problem of restricted access to a longer-term issue, noting that due to government neglect, communities in close proximity to polluting industries have long borne the disproportional brunt of pollution.
Citizens living in areas of New Orleans that have suffered pollution-related health problems are just one example, said Sorvalis. "The people living in what is known as 'cancer alley' have never been treated in a responsible way by the Louisiana State Department of Environmental Protection or the federal EPA. Why would one expect that to change in the midst of this disaster?"
###
TAKE ACTION
OMB Watch has posted a link for citizens to take action on this issue by urging the EPA to inform the public of its testing results as soon as possible. To access the website click here.
###
SOURCES:
[1] "Senior EPA official calls hurricane testing inadequate," Greenwire, Sept. 12, 2005
[2] "A Flawed Tool - Environmental Reporters' Experiences With the Freedom of Information Act," Society of Environmental Journalists, Sept. 12, 2005
Tell a friend about BushGreenwatch
Sep 20, 2005 | Back Issues
Critics Say EPA Withholding Information on New Orleans Contamination
Journalists, government watchdogs and a top Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official have criticized EPA's inability to provide adequate data on the location and danger of chemicals leaked into New Orleans communities in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
Last week Hugh Kaufman, a senior EPA policy analyst in the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, said of EPA's water testing efforts, "There is not enough information to draw any conclusions other than EPA has become totally incompetent at water testing, or there is a cover up." [1]
George Sorvalis, outreach associate for OMB Watch, a nonprofit government accountability group, told BushGreenwatch, "EPA does not appear to be testing for chemicals related to the petrochemical and oil industries, including diesel and byproducts of petrochemical refining. These are chemicals you would expect EPA to test for."
"EPA's sampling to date has been spotty and inconsistent," says Darryl Malek-Wiley, a New Orleans-based environmental justice advocate for Sierra Club, who spoke to BushGreenwatch from Baton Rouge. "The amount of sampling that has been done doesn't fully characterize what is happening in New Orleans."
Sorvalis, who has been in close communication with a number of scientists and researchers working in the New Orleans area, said EPA's failure to assess the presence and danger of such chemicals presents a particular concern for rescue workers and others exposed to the contaminated water. "Many chemical byproducts of the petrochemical industry are hazardous to human health and can breach certain types of protective gear," said Sorvalis. "If EPA is not testing for them, how can people make the right choices to protect themselves?"
Not only has EPA failed to distinguish exactly which petrochemical industry byproducts lurk in the floodwaters, said Sorvalis, but the limited amount of information EPA has is poorly organized and difficult to access. "This information should be available by a click of the mouse, but it has taken me, a professional, days to find out the real story."
Sorvalis isn't the only one having trouble getting "the real story" from EPA. Environmental reporters have complained about delayed responses from the agency regarding locations of spills, accidents and fires.
According to a report by the Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ), which cites interviews with numerous environmental reporters, "Journalists are having an increasingly difficult time using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to drag information out of the federal government to shed light on Superfund sites, chemical factories, mining accidents and a host of other topics important to citizens." [2]
Sean Moulton, senior information policy analyst at OMB Watch, says journalists' complaints and his organization's difficulty obtaining certain information are two parts of a common problem brewing within EPA: "A culture of restricting access."
Sorvalis ties the problem of restricted access to a longer-term issue, noting that due to government neglect, communities in close proximity to polluting industries have long borne the disproportional brunt of pollution.
Citizens living in areas of New Orleans that have suffered pollution-related health problems are just one example, said Sorvalis. "The people living in what is known as 'cancer alley' have never been treated in a responsible way by the Louisiana State Department of Environmental Protection or the federal EPA. Why would one expect that to change in the midst of this disaster?"
###
TAKE ACTION
OMB Watch has posted a link for citizens to take action on this issue by urging the EPA to inform the public of its testing results as soon as possible. To access the website click here.
###
SOURCES:
[1] "Senior EPA official calls hurricane testing inadequate," Greenwire, Sept. 12, 2005
[2] "A Flawed Tool - Environmental Reporters' Experiences With the Freedom of Information Act," Society of Environmental Journalists, Sept. 12, 2005